Old fashioned, maybe.
Not unliberated. It takes a liberated woman to do what is best for her, not what the men she dates want her to do.
It's not a big deal to me either way. Personal choice.
If a woman wants to lose her virginity but doesn't for "moral" reasons as opposed to personal reasons I'd say yes, she's unliberated.
If a woman loses it not because she wants to, but because she doesn't want to be viewed as old fashioned, then I think that's a shame. Everyone has their own way of going about sexuality.
I think it depends on if you are a male or female and what the societal norms are. Males get this image that they will just loose their virginity to any girl available, while even though girls are told they are suppose to wait for marriage, they might not do that but wait until they find the perfect guy. The thing is that is people tend to equate keeping your virginity until you are married because of religious reasons or because they group up in an environment where it expected and not being a virgin was not very well tolerated. Some women might virgins because they are not sexually attracted to men. Some might be virgins because they have low libido. some might have had some styles of sex but not penis vagina intercourse and feel that if oral sex gives them a good enough orgasm that why even worry having sex intercourse. Even though birth control might be easy to do with now a days because there is such a variety, there is more of a risk of disease. Not because we are not educated about stds, its just that there seem to be more of a spread of them. Plus unless a girl has the sex drive of a man and sees sex as purily physical she wil more likely be emotional and it can be difficult for some women to loose their virginity. Some girls are not so lucky when a man has been with her for a long time has sex and then leaves. Maybe if a girl keeps her virginity or recycles it until marriage she will have a less likeable chance of the guy leaving her if they are married. Now if he cheats on her thats another issue.
No. It means that some woman are strong willed and intelligent enough to defend themselves against the moronic and selfish males whose only purpose in life is to cure her of her condition.
No i don't think so.it's either they are looking after them self, just not interested (were all interested...lol) or just never really have the chance.
honestly i don't think so.
you belong to india.
virginity is sacred only to women
but nothing wrong its your freedom
i think it is a cool thing, but it is also the hardest thing. it is like lieing to people around you, it is not the best thing to do, but u do that all the time yet you will tell your kids, lieing is bad.
DO NOT LIE.....hahahahaha(double meaning)
Being a virgin is an obligation that defines your dignity as a woman before marriage. So if you lost your virginity before you get any marriage then you tend to be unpure. Being old fashioned, on the other hand, is not an obligation. Although there will be some (or many criticisms) about being old fashioned, its better to stay virgin before marriage than to become spiritually unpure which will also attract critics like a magnet. If you become pregnant, outside marriage, that will be another freaking problem. Then you're busted!!!..... My advise is that you should'nt always follow the trend which can therefore make the society go bad sometimes. So the answer, a big NO. Lead your own way!!!
Being a virgin over 16 simply means that a girl/woman hasn't met a man with knowledge to express control over women.