I am glad you asked me for the warranty information. Here is exactly what Michelin states in their warranty. What is not covered; Tires which become unserviceable due to the addition of liquid, solid or gaseous materials other than air, nitrogen or carbon dioxide.
No one has yet made a determination that my tire is indeed unserviceable. They have only refused to repair it due to my use of FAF. They claim that this policy has been in place for years, although last December I had a flat on this same vehicle, used FAF and they patched the tire.
I get the point that the use of FAF for tire techs is an emotional one - no one has been able to supply any scientific evidence to me that the use of FAF causes any type of no serviceability in tire repair. And besides, blaming the use of FAF on the car owner and not specifically the FAF manufacturer shields tire shops from liability and opens up a new line of business for these tire pros - selling unneeded tires to unsuspecting consumers.
My tires were all purchased on 9/2/07 - my van had 132,800 miles on it at the time. I had my first flat on 12/23/07 at 134,703 miles and my second on 3/12/08 at 135,705 miles. Hard to believe that after only less than 3,000 miles my tires are considered unserviceable.
Tags: fix, flat, QUESTION